MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392151820 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3361801

TrustNextGen: Security Aspects of Trustworthy Next-Generation Industrial Internet of Things

2024· article· en· W4392151820 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Data Security Solutions
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersScience and Engineering Research Board
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer securityInternet of ThingsTrustworthinessIndustrial InternetThe InternetInternet privacyComputer networkWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the expansion of Internet-of-Things (IoT), security of smart devices is becoming major or primary concern in today’s era. The increasing demand of consumer electronics due its recent evolution, the personal information that is shared is becoming valuable. In addition, the next generation of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) devices include features such as low cost, automation, intelligence provision, reduced overhead, efficiency, and remote interactions while communicating or transmitting information among themselves. There are very few authors who have focused on next gen IIoT while improving the efficiency along with providing the security among devices in the network. Therefore, we have proposed a hybrid trusted model by integrating objective model and fuzzy evaluation matrix method to ensure a secure and efficient transmission method among devices in the network. The proposed mechanism is simulated and experimented over various parameters such as detection ratio and network-related performance and functional tests compared to state-of-art solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it