MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Anomalous Behaviour Detection via Event-Based Metric with Sequential Tracking in a V2X Environment

2023· article· en· W4392152516 on OpenAlexaff
Murat Arda Önsü, Murat Şimşek, Burak Kantarcı

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetric (unit)Computer scienceEvent (particle physics)Tracking (education)Artificial intelligenceData miningReal-time computingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Massive amount of data transmission in vehicle-to-everything (V2X) settings lead to heavy utilization of communication channels. Furthermore, reliable connectivity and fast data transmission can be achieved by either re-engineering the network architecture or using efficient methods that alter data attributes, such as volume. This paper proposes a new method called Sequential Tracking along with an event-based distracted driving detection algorithm. Existing studies using machine learning models and object detection aim to detect distracted drivers and send their detection outcomes to the cloud or edge units. However, minimizing the data transmission or exchange overhead remains understudied. Therefore, the proposed Sequential Tracking method with an event-based algorithm is applied to distracted driving detection models to reduce the data transmission overhead due to false predictions, i.e., false positives or false negatives. Furthermore, the proposed method considers the camera's inference time and storage capacity since AI models are deployed to edge units for these kinds of tasks. Numerical results, with the inclusion of parameter tuning, confirm that the overall accuracy performance of the model can be improved from 87% to 91%. Moreover, following upon parameter-tuning, false predictions in the test dataset are eliminated, and the number of data points is reduced to less than one-tenth leading to significant traffic reduction between the edge unit and the cloud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207