Maximizing Network Connectivity for UAV Communications via Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is anticipated that integrating unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs), resulting in RIS-assisted UAV networks, will offer improved network connectivity against node failures for the beyond 5G networks. In this context, we utilize a RIS to provide path diversity and alternative connectivity options for information flow from user equipment (UE) to UAVs by adding more links to the network, thereby maximizing its connectivity. This paper employs the algebraic connectivity metric, which is adjusted by the reflected links of the RIS, to formulate the problem of maximizing the network connectivity in two cases. First, we consider formulating the problem for one UE, which is solved optimally using a linear search. Then, we consider the problem of a more general case of multiple UEs, which has high computational complexity. To tackle this problem, we formulate the problem of maximizing the network connectivity as a semi-definite programming (SDP) optimization problem that can be solved efficiently in polynomial time. In both cases, our proposed solutions find the best combination between UE(s) and UAVs through the RIS. As a result, it tunes the phase shifts of the RIS to direct the signals of the UEs to the appropriate UAVs, thus maximizing the network connectivity. Simulation results are conducted to assess the performance of the proposed solutions compared to the existing solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".