A Comprehensive Machine Learning Approach for COVID-19 Target Discovery in the Small-Molecule Metabolome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Respiratory viruses, including influenza, RSV, and COVID-19, cause various respiratory infections. Distinguishing these viruses relies on diagnostic methods such as PCR testing. Challenges stem from overlapping symptoms and the emergence of new strains. Advanced diagnostics are crucial for accurate detection and effective management. This study leveraged nasopharyngeal metabolome data to predict respiratory virus scenarios including control vs RSV, control vs influenza A, control vs COVID-19, control vs all respiratory viruses, and COVID-19 vs influenza A/RSV. Our advanced machine learning models, including linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, random forest, and logistic regression, exhibited superior accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to previous supervised machine learning approaches. Key techniques such as feature ranking, standard scaling, and SMOTE were used to address class imbalances, thus enhancing model robustness. SHAP analysis identified crucial metabolites influencing positive predictions, thereby providing valuable insights into diagnostic markers. Our approach not only outperformed existing methods but also revealed top dominant features for predicting COVID-19, including Lysophosphatidylcholine acyl C18:2, Kynurenine, Phenylalanine, Valine, tyrosine, and aspartic Acid (Asp). These compounds play critical roles in metabolic pathways and have been identified as top contributors to predictive models in COVID-19 respiratory virus scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".