MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392157279 · doi:10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.787

Factors associated with clinical practice competency among nursing and health science students in Ethiopia

2024· article· en· W4392157279 on OpenAlex
Kaleab Tesfaye Tegegne, Jemberu Chane Fetene, Tadele Kassahun Wudu, Yosef Aragaw Gonete, Abebe Tadesse Tibebu, Yideg Abinew, Moges Tadesse Abebe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChristian Journal for Global Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingMedicineNursing scienceMedical educationPsychologyClinical PracticeFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Clinical practice competence is affected by different factors in a clinical setting like the skill of the educator, staff–student interaction, and a clear assessment guideline. Effective mentoring and constructive feedback will also influence learning. Poor performance is caused by low competence and improving competency should improve performance. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to assess factors affecting the clinical practice competency of medical and health science students in Ethiopia. Methods: We conducted a related literature search (February up to March 2023) of PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies describing the factors associated with clinical practice competency among medical and health science students in Ethiopia. The quality of studies was independently assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa quality scale (NOS), which was guided by the PRISMA checklist. The Q test and I2 statistics were used to evaluate the heterogeneity among selected studies. If the heterogeneity was obvious (I2>50%), the random effects model (REM) was used. If the heterogeneity was low (I2≤50%), the fixed effects model (FEM) was used. Results: There were 1613 participants in four (4) investigations. The pooled effect size of clinical practice competency among students in the form of odds ratio (OR) with the presence of a checklist was 3.40 (95% CI 2.50–4.62), p<0.01, I2=0%), with the orientation of objective was 3.84 (95% CI 2.29–6.43), p<0.00001, I2=57%), having confidence during performing the procedure was 2.16 (95% CI 1.17–3.99), p=0.01, I2=53%). The final pooled effect size after trim and fill analysis in the random effect model was found to be 1.27 (95%CI: -0.19, -2.73) for the association between staff encouragement to do practice and clinical practice competency. This indicated that absence of a significant association between staff encouragement to do practice and clinical practice competency among medical and health science students in Ethiopia. Conclusions: The presence of a checklist, the orientation of objective, and students having confidence while performing a procedure are factors associated with clinical practice competency among nursing and health science students in Ethiopia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.416 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it