Towards Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for HMM Training
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hidden Markov model (HMM) has played a pivotal role in various IoT applications due to its ability to model time-varying sequences. Since the datasets usually live in isolated islands and their privacy naturally demands to be seriously considered, the HMM should be trained in a privacy-preserving manner. A typical HMM training framework is federated learning, in which a federated server and many data owners collaboratively train an HMM without revealing data owners' data to the federated server and the trained model to data owners. Since existing HMM training schemes are computationally intensive, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving federated learning scheme for HMM training to address the efficiency issue in this paper. First, we transform all HMM training computations into matrices- and vectors-based computations over real domains. Then, we introduce our federated HMM training scheme by applying matrix encryption to protect the HMM training privacy. After that, we show that our scheme is privacy-preserving through a rigorous analysis on the security of our scheme. We illustrate that our scheme is efficient through extensive experimental evaluation on the performance of our scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".