Long-Term Prediction of Remaining Useful Life for Industrial IoT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), a branch of the Internet of Things (IoT) for the industrial sector, plays a vital role in integrating industrial equipment, monitoring equipment health, and improving the overall efficiency of industrial production process. Accurately predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) of IIoT equipment is a crucial task in prognostic health management (PHM), which analyzes the degradation trend of industrial equipment to schedule maintenance activi-ties in a timely manner. Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTMs), have been widely used in RUL prediction. However, these techniques face challenges in incorporating long-sequence information to capture degradation trends and predicting long-term RUL values. In this paper, we propose an Informer-based method, Co-Informer, for long-term RUL prediction. Co-Informer utilizes a series of sensor data to provide the predicted RUL values during an upcoming time window. In our research, extensive experiments are carried out with C-MAPSS, a widely used turbofan engine degradation dataset provided by NASA. Our experimental results indicate that Co-Informer outperforms the state-of-the-art schemes for RUL prediction in terms of Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it