MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Secure Terahertz Indoor Communications Using Blockage Feature-Based Artificial Noise in 6G

2023· article· en· W4392158201 on OpenAlexaff
Suheng Tian, Ying Ju, Lei Liu, Qingqi Pei, Ning Zhang, Celimuge Wu, Shahid Mumtaz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTerahertz radiationComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Noise (video)TelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceOptoelectronicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terahertz communication with abundant spectrum resources is envisioned as the key technology of 6G. Despite its narrow beam, terahertz transmission is still vulnerable to eaves-dropping attacks in indoor scenarios. In this paper, we propose a blockage feature-based artificial noise scheme to safeguard the indoor network in the presence of multiple access points (APs), users, and eavesdroppers. Those APs with blocked links to the typical user are selected to emit artificial noise to deteriorate the reception of eavesdroppers. Thus, communication security is ensured without escalating the instability of legitimate connections caused by the small coverage nature of terahertz beams. By comprehensively considering the propagation characteristics of terahertz, such as the three dimensions narrow beam and the human blocking effect, we derive the theoretical expressions of the connection outage probability, the secrecy outage probability, and the average number of perfect links per unit area. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme outperforms the traditional schemes in terms of connection stability and secrecy performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207