MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Dual-Hop Massive MIMO IoT Networks with UAV DF Relaying and Hybrid Beamforming

2023· article· en· W4392158229 on OpenAlexafffund
Asil Koç, Mobeen Mahmood, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBeamformingComputer scienceMIMOComputer networkHop (telecommunications)Dual (grammatical number)Internet of ThingsTelecommunicationsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study considers a dual-hop massive multiple-input multiple-output (mMIMO) system, where a decode-and-forward (DF) relay in the form of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) facilitates the transmission of multiple data streams from a base station (BS) to a gateway serving multiple Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices. To maximize the end-to-end throughput in a three-node wireless sensor network (WSN), we investigate a novel joint optimization problem of hybrid beamforming (HBF) and UAV relay positioning in a given deployment span. The study adopts a geometry-based millimeter-wave (mmWave) channel model for both links and utilizes particle swarm optimization (PSO) to optimize the UAV location. The radio frequency (RF) stage is designed to minimize the number of RF chains through the utilization of slow time-varying angular information, while the baseband (BB) stage is designed through singular value decomposition (SVD) of the reduced-dimension effective channel matrix. The illustrative results show that the proposed joint HBF approach enhances energy efficiency compared to full-digital beamforming, and the UAV DF relay, placed via the PSO-based deployment scheme, attains a higher capacity compared to fixed UAV deployment locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207