MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Secure and Efficient Federated Learning for Robust Intrusion Detection in IoT Networks

2023· article· en· W4392158746 on OpenAlexaff
Zakaria Abou El Houda, Hajar Moudoud, Lyes Khoukhi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInternet of ThingsIntrusion detection systemComputer securityComputer networkDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) has increased the demand for robust intrusion detection systems. Federated learning (FL) has appeared as a potential solution to improve the security of IoT networks by facilitating collaboration between multiple devices in training a unified model while keeping their data secure. As the training process of FL occurs locally on individual devices, preserving data privacy becomes crucial. Additionally, combining model updates from multiple devices into a unified model can be challenging. Therefore, addressing these issues is critical to effective and private FL-based intrusion detection in IoT networks. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for ensuring privacy and efficiency in FL for robust intrusion detection in the IoT. Our approach combines secure aggregation and blockchain technology to protect the privacy of IoT data while enabling efficient and accurate model training. We first introduce a secure aggregation algorithm that can be used to combine the model updates from multiple devices in a privacy-preserving manner. This algorithm uses multi-party computation to prevent any single party from seeing the data of the other parties, thereby ensuring that the privacy of IoT data is maintained throughout the model training process. Then, we incorporate the use of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and prevent tampering. Finally, we perform experiments on real-world IoT datasets to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Our results show that our approach achieves high accuracy in intrusion detection while preserving the privacy of the IoT data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207