Evaluating the effects of climate change on river water temperature downstream of a hydropower reservoir in western Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper evaluates the impact of climate change on the water temperature of the Nechako River near the town of Vanderhoof (British Columbia, Canada). To do so, the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) hydraulic and water temperature model was used with data from 10 climate models representing two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP 2-4.5 and SSP 5-8.5) over two future time periods (2041-2070 and 2071-2100). The results showed an upward trend in projected water temperatures for all tested discharge rates from the impounding reservoir during the warmest periods of the year. The study found that water temperatures are expected to increase by up to 2.57 °C for the near future (2041-2070) and up to 3.56 °C on average for all flow scenarios studied for a far future (2071-2100) when using SSP5-8.5. The timing of the peak water temperature during the summer is also expected to shift, with maximum water temperatures occurring up to 10 days later than in the reference period. In 10.3% of the far future SSP5-8.5 scenarios, at least one day per summer had a mean daily temperature of at least 24 °C, which exceeds limits of 20 °C for sockeye salmon and 21 °C for white sturgeon which are considered detrimental for the fish. It has been shown that over 50% of sockeye salmon will stop their sustained swimming at water temperatures of 24 °C due to cardiac limitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".