MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392163466 · doi:10.18280/i2m.230102

Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Sensor Cloud Through Time Series Forecasting of Sensor Data

2024· article· en· W4392163466 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kalyan Das, Satyabrata Das, Monalisha Pattnaik

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingSeries (stratigraphy)Time seriesComputer scienceReal-time computingMachine learningOperating systemGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's interconnected world, diverse sensor types are critical for powering various applications and services.The limited energy resources of these sensors present a significant challenge in managing sensor networks efficiently.To address this, we propose an energy-saving sensor cloud that utilizes a data prediction technique.Typically, a sensor node in a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) gathers and transmits data to the cloud every 10 minutes, consuming substantial energy.In contrast, our proposed method requires sensor nodes to communicate with the cloud every 110 minutes, as the cloud system's forecasting method is capable of predicting ten steps ahead, thus reducing transmission frequency.We have applied Wavelet-based Forecasting (WBF), Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), and a hybrid ARIMA-WBF for these predictions.The ARIMA model demonstrates superior performance compared to the other techniques when dealing with linear sensor data.Our method results in a power consumption that is approximately 90.9% lower than that of traditional methods within the sensor cloud, owing to reduced data transmission frequency.Additionally, our approach yields notably lower Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumentation Mesure MétrologieSame topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207