Localized radiotherapy of solid tumors using radiopharmaceutical loaded implantable system: insights from a mathematical model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Computational models yield valuable insights into biological interactions not fully elucidated by experimental approaches. This study investigates an innovative spatiotemporal model for simulating the controlled release and dispersion of radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) using 177Lu-PSMA, a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted radiopharmaceutical, within solid tumors via a dual-release implantable delivery system. Local delivery of anticancer agents presents a strategic approach to mitigate adverse effects while optimizing therapeutic outcomes. Methods This study evaluates various factors impacting RPT efficacy, including hypoxia region extension, binding affinity, and initial drug dosage, employing a novel 3-dimensional computational model. Analysis gauges the influence of these factors on radiopharmaceutical agent concentration within the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, spatial and temporal radiopharmaceutical distribution within both the tumor and surrounding tissue is explored. Results Analysis indicates a significantly higher total concentration area under the curve within the tumor region compared to surrounding normal tissue. Moreover, drug distribution exhibits notably superior efficacy compared to the radiation source. Additionally, low microvascular density in extended hypoxia regions enhances drug availability, facilitating improved binding to PSMA receptors and enhancing therapeutic effectiveness. Reductions in the dissociation constant (KD) lead to heightened binding affinity and increased internalized drug concentration. Evaluation of initial radioactivities (7.1×107, 7.1×108, and 7.1×109 [Bq]) indicates that an activity of 7.1×108 [Bq] offers a favorable balance between tumor cell elimination and minimal impact on normal tissues. Discussion These findings underscore the potential of localized radiopharmaceutical delivery strategies and emphasize the crucial role of released drugs relative to the radiation source (implant) in effective tumor treatment. Decreasing the proximity of the drug to the microvascular network and enhancing its distribution within the tumor promote a more effective therapeutic outcome. The study furnishes valuable insights for future experimental investigations and clinical trials, aiming to refine medication protocols and minimize reliance on in vivo testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".