MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392172866 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2024.3370698

Enhancing Next-Generation Urban Connectivity: Is the Integrated HAPS-Terrestrial Network a Solution?

2024· article· en· W4392172866 on OpenAlexaff
Afsoon Alidadi Shamsabadi, Animesh Yadav, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkTelecommunicationsDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Located in the stratospheric layer of Earth’s atmosphere, high altitude platform station (HAPS) is a promising network infrastructure, which can bring significant advantages to sixth-generation (6G) and beyond wireless communications systems by forming vertical heterogeneous networks (vHetNets). However, if not dealt with properly, integrated networks suffer from several performance challenges compared to standalone networks. In harmonized spectrum integrated networks, where different tiers share the same frequency spectrum, interference is an important challenge to be addressed. This work focuses on an integrated HAPS-terrestrial network, serving users in an overlapped urban geographic area, and formulates a fairness optimization problem, aiming to maximize the minimum spectral efficiency (SE) of the network. Due to the highly nonconvex nature of the formulated problem, we develop a rapid converging iterative algorithm that designs the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) beamforming weights and the user association scheme such that the propagated inter- and intra-tier interference is managed. Simulation results demonstrate the proposed algorithm’s superiority over standalone terrestrial networks and scenario where only the beamforming weights are optimized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207