MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392181586

<b> Effects of different exercise programs in clinic and functional status of overweight women </b>

2006· article· en· W4392181586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Denis Foschini, Felipe Fedrizzi Donatto, Clílton Kraüss de Oliveira Ferreira, Renata Manzatto, Jonato Prestes, Rodrigo Dias, Cláudia Regina Cavaglieri

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverweightPhysical therapyPhysical activityPsychologyGerontologyMedicineDemographyObesityInternal medicineSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present day physical exercise has been indicated as a tool in the prevention of chronic degenerative illness, between them the obesity. In this way, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different short duration exercise protocols on body composition, aerobic capacity and muscle strength. 20 women classifiedwith overweight, 28.5 years old in average, 77.77kg body mass and 34.17% of body fat were selected. The participants were randomly divided in the following groups: I) a group that performed 4 weeks of strength, aerobic with bicycle and/or treadmill and circuit training, identified as (FAC, n=10) and II) a group that performed 4 weeksof strength and aerobic training, exclusively composed by bicycle and/or treadmill, identified by (FA; n=10). The evaluation before the beginning of the exercise training served as the control baseline, composing respectively the control FAC group (ConFAC, n=10) and the control FA group (ConFA, n=10). Body fat was measured by bioelectrical impedance. Strength training loads were determined by load repetitions test and VO2max was estimated by Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test 1.600 meters walking protocol. Both groups showed non significant reductions inthe variables: body mass, body fat, fat mass, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist hip ratio and fat free mass maintenance. However, VO2max significant statistical increase was observed only for FAC group. The exercised groups showed increase in strength production capacity, (p≤0.05). These results indicate that, even ashort training period (4 weeks) induce positive adaptations in functional status of this population. <b> RESUMO</b>Atualmente o exercício físico tem sido indicado como uma ferramenta na prevenção de doenças crônico degenerativas, dentre elas a obesidade. Neste sentido, o presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos de diferentes protocolos de exercício de curta duração sobre a composição corporal, capacidade aeróbia e forçamuscular. Foram selecionadas vinte mulheres classificadas com excesso de peso, idade média de 28,5 anos, massa corporal 77,77kg e gordura corporal 34,17%. As participantes foram divididas aleatoriamente nos grupos: I) grupo que realizou 4 semanas de Componente Força (exercícios contra-resistência) e Componente Aeróbio(bicicleta estacionária e/ou esteira e treinamento em circuito com exercícios contra-resistência), sendo identificado pela sigla (FAC, n=10) e II) grupo que realizou 4 semanas de Componente Força (exercícios contra-resistência) e Componente Aeróbio (composto somente por bicicleta estacionária e/ou esteira), sendo identificado pela sigla (FA, n=10). A avaliação anterior ao início do programa serviu como os dados de controle, formando respectivamente os grupos controle FAC (ConFAC, n=10) e controle FA (ConFA, n=10). A gordura corporal foi avaliada por bioimpedância elétrica. As cargas do treinamento de força foram determinadas pelo teste de carga por repetições e o VO2max estimado pelo protocolo de caminhada de 1.600 metros do Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test. Ambos os grupos apresentaram diminuições não significativas, nas variáveis: massa corporal, gordura corporal, massa gorda, circunferências da cintura e quadril, relação cintura-quadril e manutenção na massa magra. Aumentos estatisticamente significantes no VO2max foram observados apenas no grupo FAC. Ambos os grupos apresentaram melhora na capacidade de geração de força, (p≤0.05). Esses resultados demonstram que mesmo um treinamento realizado por curto período (4 semanas) pode induzir adaptações positivas no quadro funcional dessa população.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.263
GPT teacher head0.597
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207