MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392185499 · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00557

A Simplified Proteomics LC-MRM-MS Assay for Determination of apoE Genotypes in Plasma Samples

2024· article· en· W4392185499 on OpenAlexafffund
Deema O. Qasrawi, Abdulhameed Al‐Ghabkari, Rania M. Khan, Evgeniy V. Petrotchenko, Manuel Montero‐Odasso, Christoph H. Borchers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsParkwood InstituteWestern UniversityMcGill UniversityLawson Health Research InstituteJewish General Hospital
FundersNational Cancer InstituteOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationWarren Y. Soper Charitable TrustFondation De Famille Alvin SegalSchulich School of Medicine and DentistryJewish General HospitalWeston Family FoundationConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsChromatographyProteomicsGenotypeChemistryApolipoprotein ESelected reaction monitoringMass spectrometryTandem mass spectrometryBiochemistryMedicineInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apolipoprotein E (apoE), a polymorphic plasma protein, plays a pivotal role in lipid transportation. The human apoE gene possesses three major alleles (ε2, ε3, and ε4), which differ by single amino acid (cysteine to arginine) substitutions. The ε4 allele represents the primary genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), whereas the ε2 allele protects against the disease. Knowledge of a patient's apoE genotype has high diagnostic value. A recent study has introduced an LC-MRM-MS-based proteomic approach for apoE isoform genotyping using stable isotope-labeled peptide internal standards (SIS). Here, our goal was to develop a simplified LC-MRM-MS assay for identifying apoE genotypes in plasma samples, eliminating the need for the use of SIS peptides. To determine the apoE genotypes, we monitored the chromatographic peak area ratios of isoform-specific peptides relative to a peptide that is common to all apoE isoforms. The assay results correlated well with the standard TaqMan allelic discrimination assay, and we observed a concordance between the two methods for all but three out of 172 samples. DNA sequencing of these three samples has confirmed that the results of the LC-MRM-MS method were correct. Thus, our simplified UPLC-MRM-MS assay is a feasible and reliable method for identifying apoE genotypes without using SIS internal standard peptides. The approach can be seamlessly incorporated into existing quantitative proteomics assays and kits, providing additional valuable apoE genotype information. The principle of using signal ratios of the protein isoform-specific peptides to the peptide common for all of the protein isoforms has the potential to be used for protein isoform determination in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207