MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392187177 · doi:10.1093/ije/dyae027

Risk factors for uncontrolled blood pressure among individuals with hypertension on treatment: the CONSTANCES population-based study

2024· article· en· W4392187177 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Cherfane, Alexandre Vallée, Sofiane Kab, Pascale Salameh, Marcel Goldberg, Marie Zins, Jacques Blacher

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Epidemiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheMeso Scale DiagnosticsH. Lundbeck A/SAstraZeneca
KeywordsBlood pressureMedicinePopulationInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) among individuals with hypertension on treatment, by sex. METHODS: We conducted a nested cross-sectional analysis using data from the population-based cohort study CONSTANCES, designed as a randomly selected sample of French adults aged 18-69 years at study inception. We included 11 760 participants previously diagnosed with hypertension and taking antihypertensive medications. Uncontrolled BP was defined as mean systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or mean diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg. Sex-specific age-adjusted multivariable analyses were performed using logistic regression models stratified by stages of uncontrolled hypertension. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 59.4 years. The prevalence of uncontrolled BP was 51.4%, and it was higher in men than in women [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.80; 95% CI, 1.67-1.94]. In both sexes, the lower the age, the lower the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension. Low level of education and history of cardiovascular events had, respectively, higher and lower odds of uncontrolled BP. In men, additional risk factors included overweight and obesity (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.32; and aOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.23-1.70, respectively), lack of physical activity (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40), low adherence to a Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension diet (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.40) and heavy alcohol consumption (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.08-1.63), with the last two factors persisting across different stages of uncontrolled BP. CONCLUSIONS: From a population-based perspective, socio-economic and behavioural characteristics were risk factors for uncontrolled hypertension, but they differed by sex and by stage of uncontrolled hypertension. Modifiable risk factors, such as weight, diet, physical activity and alcohol consumption, have an important role in the control of hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of EpidemiologySame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207