MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392187671 · doi:10.2523/iptc-24106-ms

Experiment and FEM Modelling of Stress Shadow Effect in Multi-Stage Hydraulic Fracturing to Optimize the Stimulation

2024· article· en· W4392187671 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Li, Jingyi Wang, Ian D. Gates, Tiange Chen, Zigang Zheng, Wenfeng Lyu, Jian Gao, Hongwei Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic fracturingFinite element methodStress (linguistics)Stage (stratigraphy)Shadow (psychology)Computer scienceGeologyPetroleum engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The stress shadow effect is well observed in the field operations of multi-stage hydraulic fracturing and it can greatly influence the fracturing effect. In the research documented here, lab experiments were made with the artificial gelatin blocks to visually examine the stress shadow effect during multi-stage hydraulic fracturing process. A related finite element modelling was conducted to understand the changes of the stress distribution after a first-stage hydraulic fracture evolved. The results of the visual fracturing experiments and finite element modelling (FEM) were consistent, which illustrated that a later-stage hydraulic fracture that follows an previous-stage hydraulic fracture may have its orientation and fracturing pressure altered from that of the previous one due to the altered stress distribution in the formation nearby. The experiment observations clearly showed the process of a first-stage hydraulic fracture generated obliquely at the very beginning due to near-wellbore effect and then turned to extend more and more perpendicularly to the direction of the minimum principal stress. After this first-stage fracturing done, a second-stage fracturing started but the fracture evolved towards a different direction that is nearly orthogonal to the first-stage fracture. According to the related FEM modelling, the main stress shadow affected region was within a range that depends on the injection pressure and the principal stresses difference in the formation nearby. If the later-stage hydraulic fracturing is done beyond this range, the fracture will have a similar orientation and fracturing pressure to the previous one. A suitable spacing between each stage as well as the injection pressure should be well designed to optimize the stimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207