Deep-Learning Domain Adaptation to Improve Generalizability across Subjects and Contexts in Detecting Construction Workers’ Stress from Biosignals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wearable biosensors, in conjunction with machine learning, have been employed to develop less invasive monitoring techniques for assessing stress among construction workers during fieldwork. However, existing techniques face limitations in terms of scalable field application due to their subject and context dependency; it is difficult to apply them to new people in new contexts without additional labeled data collection. Therefore, this study developed a stress detection technique that incorporates domain adaptation, simultaneously learning a classifier and a subject- and context-independent features, in this way advancing generalizability. The proposed technique consistently demonstrated superior accuracy compared with benchmarks in classifying stress levels within a testing data set whose subjects and contexts were different from those of training data sets. Thus, the technique can advance generalizability across subjects and contexts. This finding can help us to reliably detect stress for new people in new contexts without additional labeled data collection, thereby contributing to scalable field application of wearable-based stress monitoring at construction sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it