MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392189766 · doi:10.1101/2024.02.23.581734

HippoMaps: Multiscale cartography of the human hippocampal formation

2024· preprint· en· W4392189766 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan DeKraker, Donna Gift Cabalo, Jessica Royer, Ali R. Khan, Bradley Karat, Oualid Benkarim, Raúl Rodríguez‐Cruces, Birgit Frauscher, Raluca Pana, Justine Y. Hansen, Bratislav Mišić, Sofie L. Valk, Jonathan C. Lau, Matthias Kirschner, Andrea Bernasconi, Neda Bernasconi, Sascha E.A. Muenzing, Markus Axer, Katrin Amunts, Alan C. Evans, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHippocampal formationHippocampusNeuroscienceNeuroinformaticsArtificial intelligenceCartographyPsychologyData scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hippocampus has a unique microarchitecture, is situated at the nexus of multiple macroscale functional networks, contributes to numerous cognitive as well as affective processes, and is highly susceptible to brain pathology across common disorders. These features make the hippocampus a model to understand how brain structure covaries with function, in both health and disease. Here, we introduce HippoMaps, an open access toolbox and online data warehouse for the mapping and contextualization of hippocampal data in the human brain (http://hippomaps.readthedocs.io). HippoMaps capitalizes on a novel hippocampal unfolding approach as well as shape intrinsic registration capabilities to allow for cross-subject and cross-modal data aggregation. We initialize this repository with data spanning 3D post-mortem histology, ex-vivo 9.4 Tesla MRI, as well as in-vivo structural MRI and resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) obtained at 3 and 7 Tesla, together with intracranial encephalography (iEEG) recordings in epilepsy patients. HippoMaps also contains validated tools for spatial map association analysis in the hippocampus that correct for autocorrelation. All code and data are compliant with community standards, and comprehensive online tutorials facilitate broad adoption. Applications of this work span methodologies and modalities, spatial scales, as well as clinical and basic research contexts, and we encourage community feedback and contributions in the spirit of open and iterative scientific resource development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→