MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392189799 · doi:10.1101/2024.02.23.581759

Characterisation of mesenchymal stromal cells in the skin of Atlantic salmon

2024· preprint· en· W4392189799 on OpenAlexaff
Rose Ruiz Daniels, Sarah J. Salisbury, Lene Sveen, Rennae S. Taylor, Marianne Vaadal, Torstein Tengs, Sean J. Monaghan, Paula R. Villamayor, Margaret D. Ballantyne, Carolina Peñaloza, Mark D. Fast, James E. Bron, Ross D. Houston, Nicholas A. Robinson, Diego Robledo

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
KeywordsMesenchymal stem cellWound healingStromal cellBiologyDermisCell biologyConnective tissueFibroblastDermal fibroblastPathologyAnatomyCell cultureMedicineImmunologyCancer researchGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background The skin serves as the first line of defence for an organism against the external environment. Despite the global significance of salmon in aquaculture, a critical component of this first line of defence, mesenchymal stromal cells, remains unexplored. These pluripotent cells can differentiate into various tissues, including bone, cartilage, tendon, ligament, adipocytes, dermis, muscle and connective tissue within the skin. These cells are pivotal for preserving the integrity of skin tissue throughout an organism’s lifespan and actively participate in wound healing processes. Results In this study, we characterise mesenchymal stromal cells in detail for the first time in healthy Atlantic salmon tissue and during the wound healing process. Single-nucleus sequencing and spatial transcriptomics revealed the transcriptional dynamics of these cells, elucidating the differentiation pathways leading to osteogenic and fibroblast lineages in the skin of Atlantic salmon. We charted their activity during an in vivo wound healing time course, showing clear evidence of their active role during this process, as they become transcriptionally more active during the remodelling stage of wound healing. Conclusions For the first time, we chart the activity of sub-clusters of differentiating stromal cells during the process of wound healing, revealing different spatial niches of the various MSC subclusters, and setting the stage for investigations into the manipulation of MSCs to improve fish health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207