Indoor Location Mapping of Lameness Chickens with Multi Cameras and Perspective Transform Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lameness is one of the most serious diseases affecting chickens, which can also increase the risk of premature culling of chickens and cause huge economic losses.So far, the process of detecting chicken lameness and finding out its location is still carried out traditionally by farmers checking directly in the cage, but this can actually result in increased stress levels in the chickens.Computer vision-based approaches with deep learning have been widely used to help farm automation, but there are several things that need to be considered and are problems; these include light variables, occlusion.In this study, Faster Regions with Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN), Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD) and You Only Look Once (YOLO), which is a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) network model was chosen to perform the detection, tracking, and mapping of chicken locations.YOLOv8 was combined Adam Optimizer to improve training performance.Based on the results, customized YOLOv8 has the best mAP, support, precision and F1-Score values compared to the others, with 0.922, 0.987, 0.990 and 0.988.The matrix of transformation and coordinate-to-meter conversion produces chicken locations that match real conditions, not just the position of pixel (x, y) coordinates.From the detection and tracking, the location of 1 sick (lameness) chicken and 7 healthy chickens were obtained.The results of this research can properly display the movement and position of chickens in the cage, so they can be used to monitor chicken welfare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".