Les communautés monastiques de Fontenelle-Saint-Wandrille, d’une réforme à l’autre (ixe-xie siècle)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien que l’image traditionnelle de la table rase découlant des raids vikings ait déjà été remise en question, la pauvreté des sources restreint notre connaissance du monachisme ancien sur le territoire de la future Normandie. Le cas de Fontenelle (Saint-Wandrille) apporte cependant un contrepoint utile, puisque l’histoire de la communauté et de ses réformes peut être étudiée dans ses propres termes, grâce aux Gesta Abbatum Fontanellensium du ixe siècle et à l’Inventio Sancti Vulfranni du xie, aux côtés de textes diplomatiques et hagiographiques. Ces deux sources présentent Anségise ou Gérard de Crépy comme protagonistes de réforme (ou de refondation) descendante. Tout en nuançant ces interprétations, l’accent est mis ici sur les processus par lesquels la communauté monastique a adapté ses idéaux et ses pratiques, et renouvelé sa tradition, derrière (et au-delà) de ses abbés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".