MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392192467 · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2024)210

Unified treatment of null and spatial infinity III: asymptotically minkowski space-times

2024· article· en· W4392192467 on OpenAlexafffund
Abhay Ashtekar, Neev Khera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Energy Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphPerimeter Institute
FundersPennsylvania State UniversityInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsPhysicsMinkowski spaceNull (SQL)InfinityMathematical physicsSpace (punctuation)Theoretical physicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract The Spi framework provides a 4-dimensional approach to investigate the asymptotic properties of gravitational fields as one recedes from isolated systems in any space-like direction, without reference to a Cauchy surface [1]. It is well suited to unify descriptions at null and spatial infinity because $$ \mathcal{I} $$ I arises as the null cone of i °. The goal of this work is to complete this task by introducing a natural extension of the asymptotic conditions at null and spatial infinity of [2], by ‘gluing’ the two descriptions appropriately. Space-times satisfying these conditions are asymptotically flat in both regimes and thus represent isolated gravitating systems. They will be said to be Asymptotically Minkowskian at i °. We show that in these space-times the Spi group $$ \mathfrak{S} $$ S as well as the BMS group $$ \mathcal{B} $$ B naturally reduce to a single Poincaré group, denoted by $$ {\mathfrak{p}}_{i^{{}^{\circ}}} $$ p i ° to highlight the fact that it arises from the gluing procedure at i °. The asymptotic conditions are sufficiently weak to allow for the possibility that the Newman-Penrose component $$ {\Psi}_1^{{}^{\circ}} $$ Ψ 1 ° diverges in the distant past along $$ \mathcal{I} $$ I + . This can occur in astrophysical sources that are not asymptotically stationary in the past, e.g. in scattering situations. Nonetheless, as we show in the companion paper [5], the energy momentum and angular momentum defined at i ° equals the sum of that defined at a cross-section C of $$ \mathcal{I} $$ I + and corresponding flux across $$ \mathcal{I} $$ I + to the past of C , when the quantities refer to the preferred Poincaré subgroup $$ {\mathfrak{p}}_{i^{{}^{\circ}}} $$ p i ° .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Energy Physics→Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→