MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392193510 · doi:10.1039/d4ma90021a

Correction: High performance LiMnFePO<sub>4</sub>/Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> full cells by functionalized polymeric additives

2024· article· en· W4392193510 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Christophe Daigle, Sylviane Rochon, Yuichiro Asakawa, Benoît Fleutot, Charlotte Mallet, Kamyab Amouzegar, Karim Zaghib

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceChemical engineeringNanotechnologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correction for ‘High performance LiMnFePO 4 /Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 full cells by functionalized polymeric additives’ by Jean-Christophe Daigle et al. , Mater. Adv. , 2021, 2 , 253–260, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA00679C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials AdvancesSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207