MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392195409 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3891149/v1

Sensitivities of mammals to capture and tagging: faster recovery in human-disturbed landscapes

2024· preprint· en· W4392195409 on OpenAlexaff
Jonas Stiegler, Cara A. Gallagher, Robert Hering, Thomas Mueller, Marlee A. Tucker, Marco Apollonio, Janosch Arnold, Nancy A. Barker, Leon M. F. Barthel, Bruno Bassano, Floris van Beest, Jerrold L. Belant, Anne Berger, Dean E. Beyer, Laura R. Bidner, Stephen Blake, Konstantin Börner, Francesca Brivio, Rudy Brogi, Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar, Francesca Cagnacci, Jasja Dekker, Jane Dentinger, Martin Duľa, Jarred F Duquette, Jana A. Eccard, Meaghan N. Evans, Adam W. Ferguson, Claudia Fichtel, Adam T. Ford, Nicholas L. Fowler, Benedikt Gehr, Wayne M. Getz, Jacob R. Goheen, Benoît Goossens, Stefano Grignolio, Lars Haugaard, Morgan Hauptfleisch, Morten Heim, Marco Heurich, Mark Hewison, Lynne A. Isbell, René Janssen, Anders Jarnemo, Miloš Ježek, Petra Kaczensky, Tomasz Kamiński, Peter M. Kappeler, Katharina Kasper, Todd M. Kautz, Sophia Kimmig, Peter Kjellander, Rafał Kowalczyk, Stephanie Kramer‐Schadt, Zbigniew A. Krasiński, Max Kröschel, Anette Krop-Benesch, Peter Linderoth, Christoph Lobas, Peter Lokeny, Mia-Lana Lührs, Stephanie Matsushima, Molly M. McDonough, Joerg Melzheimer, Nicolas Morellet, Dedan Ngatia, Leopold Obermair, Kirk A. Olson, Kidan C Patanant, John C. Payne, Tyler R. Petroelje, Manuel Pina, Josep Piqué, Joe Premier, Jan Pufelski, Lennart Pyritz, Maurizio Ramanzin, Manuel Roeleke, Christer M. Rolandsen, Sonia Saı̈d, Robin Sandfort, Krzysztof Schmidt, Niels Martin Schmidt, Carolin Scholz, Nadine Schubert, Nuria Selva, Agnieszka Sergiel, Laurel E. K. Serieys, Václav Silovský, Rob Slotow, Leif Sönnichsen, Erling Solberg, Mikkel Stelvig, Garrett M. Street, Peter Sunde, Nathan J. Svoboda, Maria Thaker, Maxi Tomowski, Wiebke Ullmann, Abi Tamim Vanak, Bettina Wachter, Stephen L. Webb, Christopher C. Wilmers, Filip Zięba, Tomasz Zwijacz‐Kozica, Niels Blaum

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMcDonnell Center for Systems NeuroscienceNational Science FoundationMendelova Univerzita v BrněCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeStiftung Naturschutz BerlinMinistry of Environment and Tourism NamibiaMattilsynetMesserli-StiftungRegione Autonoma della SardegnaMiljødirektoratetMinistry of EnvironmentAgence Nationale de la RechercheMississippi State UniversityYayasan Sime DarbyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSmithsonian InstitutionUniversity of California, DavisSafari Club International FoundationMichigan Department of Natural ResourcesBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNoble Research InstituteNational Geographic SocietyMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaZoologische Gesellschaft Frankfurt
KeywordsGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→