Predicting the Shelf Life of Cup Chocolate Using the Arrhenius Model Based on Peroxide Value
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shelf life of a food product is a limited period of time after production and packaging, during which it maintains the necessary and acceptable level of quality for final consumption.The aim of the research was to predict the shelf life of chocolate packaged in two bilaminated containers with respect to peroxide value, using accelerated testing and constant relative humidity.The peroxide value was evaluated by potentiometric titration.The order of the reaction was defined and with the Arrhenius model the degradation rate constant was found for each container and temperature of study.Shelf life was determined with the kinetic equation of oxidation compound formation at 5, 20 and 35℃ at 217, 114 and 64 days for the 20 microns (μ) packages, and 114, 95 and 81 days for the 50 μ packages respectively.It is concluded that the 20 μ packaging between a storage temperature of 15 and 18℃ is the suggested packaging with a shelf life between 141 and 124 days.The results would enable those working in the chocolate manufacturing and packaging industry to take the temperatures and types of packaging studied as a reference in their production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it