Multilevel proteomic profiling of colorectal adenocarcinoma cell differentiation to characterize an intestinal epithelial model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Emergent advancements on the intestinal microbiome for human health and disease treatment necessitates well-defined intestinal cellular models to study and rapidly assess host, microbiome, and drug interactions. This study characterized molecular alterations during Caco-2 cell differentiation, an epithelial intestinal model, using quantitative multi-omic approaches. We demonstrated that both spontaneous and medium-induced cellular differentiations displayed similar protein and pathway changes, including the down-regulation of proteins related to translation and proliferation, and up-regulation of proteins related to cell adhesion, molecule binding and metabolic pathways. Acetyl-proteomics revealed decreased histone acetylation and increased acetylation in proteins associated with mitochondria functions in differentiated cells. Butyrate-containing differentiation medium accelerates differentiation, with earlier up-regulation of proteins related to differentiation and host-microbiome interactions. These results emphasize the controlled progression of Caco-2 differentiation toward a specialized intestinal epithelial-like cell. This further enhances their characterization, establishing their suitability for facilitating the effective evaluation of risk and quality in microbiome-directed therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".