Material characterization of human middle ear using machine-learning-based surrogate models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to introduce a novel non-invasive method for rapid material characterization of middle-ear structures, taking into consideration the invaluable insights provided by the mechanical properties of ear tissues. Valuable insights into various ear pathologies can be gleaned from the mechanical properties of ear tissues, yet conventional techniques for assessing these properties often entail invasive procedures that preclude their use on living patients. In this study, in the first step, we developed machine-learning models of the middle ear to predict its responses with a significantly lower computational cost in comparison to finite-element models. Leveraging findings from prior research, we focused on the most influential model parameters: the Young's modulus and thickness of the tympanic membrane and the Young's modulus of the stapedial annular ligament. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) method was implemented for creating the machine-learning models. Subsequently, we combined the created machine-learning models with Bayesian optimization (BoTorch) for fast and efficient estimation of the Young's moduli of the tympanic membrane and the stapedial annular ligament. We demonstrate that the resultant surrogate models can fairly represent the vibrational responses of the umbo, stapes footplate, and vibration patterns of the tympanic membrane at most frequencies. Also, our proposed material characterization approach successfully estimated the Young's moduli of the tympanic membrane and stapedial annular ligament (separately and simultaneously) with values of mean absolute percentage error of less than 7%. The remarkable accuracy achieved through the proposed material characterization method underscores its potential for eventual clinical applications of estimating mechanical properties of the middle-ear structures for diagnostic purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".