SEXUAL INTIMACY AND THE MENTAL HEALTH AMONG OLDER ADULTS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: A recente pandemia Covid-19 teve um forte impacto nas relações entre os idosos, nomeadamente ao nível da intimidade sexual e consequente saúde mental dos idosos.A questão de investigação foi a seguinte; Como a pandemia da COVID-19 influenciou a intimidade sexual e a saúde mental dos idosos?, e os objetivos do estudo os seguintes: (1) Analisar o efeito da pandemia na intimidade sexual dos idosos e (2) Investigar a influência da intimidade sexual na saúde mental dos idosos durante a pandemia.Método: O estudo qualitativo, com amostragem por conveniência em sistema de bola de neve, envolveu 456 participantes entre os 65 e os 87 anos.Para o primeiro objetivo, emergiram cinco temas: (1) Menor satisfação sexual (68%); (2) Menor desejo sexual (67%); (3) Relações afetivas mais sólidas (34%); (4) Medo de contrair doenças físicas (29%); e (5) Menor atratividade (23%).Para o segundo tema foram referidos três temas: (1) Menor ansiedade e stress (78%); (2) Maior atenção aos estados emocionais negativos (55%); e (3) Menor tensão emocional (41%).A pandemia contribuiu negativamente para a intimidade sexual dos idosos, sendo que a intimidade sexual teve um efeito positivo sentido pelos idosos na sua saúde mental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".