MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392207736 · doi:10.1109/tce.2024.3370052

Softwarized Resource Allocation in Digital Twins-Empowered Networks for Future Quantum-Enabled Consumer Applications

2024· article· en· W4392207736 on OpenAlexaff
Haotong Cao, Sahil Garg, Shahid Mumtaz, Mubarak Alrashoud, Longxiang Yang, Georges Kaddoum

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationResource management (computing)Computer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network softwarization (NetSoft), recognized as crucial attribute of 6G networks, promises to provide enhanced and advanced services, including future quantum-enabled consumer applications. Softwarized resource allocation is the core issue in NetSoft concept. Digital twins (DT) guarantees to generate the corresponding digital world that reflects and interacts with the original physical world seamlessly. With DT empowering, the digital replica of softwarized networks can be generated to predict, simulate, analyze the softwarized resource allocation in more economical, convenient and scalable methods.In this paper, we research the softwarized resource allocation of requested services, usually, called as slices, in DT-empowered networks for future quantum-enabled consumer applications. We focus on developing efficient softwarized resource allocation algorithm. At first, we present models of the DT-empowered networks and service requests by using graph theory and hypergraph theory. Then, we design one softwarized resource management framework, labeled as DT-Slice-Soft-6G. This framework has the functions of managing softwarized resources, calculating resource allocation solution in digital replica and sending the calculated solution back to softwarized 6G networks. Thereafter, one efficient and fine-grained softwarized resource allocation algorithm, inserted in DT-Slice-Soft-6G, is detailed. This algorithm is labeled as Heu-DT-Slice-6G and is proposed based on efficient heuristic methods. To validate the highlights of DT-Slice-Soft-6G and Heu-DT-Slice-6G, we conduct the simulation work in our self-developed simulator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207