MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392207748 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3370557

Computing Offloading for RIS-Aided Internet of Everything: A Cybertwin Version

2024· article· en· W4392207748 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohui Gu, Guoan Zhang, Wei Duan, Shuping Dang, Miaowen Wen, Pin‐Han Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceThe InternetServerMultimediaComputer networkWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cybertwin technology introduces a novel paradigm employing digital twins to model complex physical systems within a cyber environment, thus enhancing communication, collaboration, and decision-making capabilities. By harnessing advanced technologies, such as reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) and multiaccess edge computing (MEC), seamless interaction between physical and virtual entities is facilitated. In this article, we propose a cybertwin-driven edge computing framework that leverages RIS technology, complemented by an efficient computing offloading strategy to support large-scale Internet of Everything (IoE) applications. Specifically, the proposed strategy focuses on a multicell system where numerous randomly distributed end users have the option to offload delay-sensitive and computing-intensive tasks to edge computing nodes. The offloading channels are enhanced by RISs through passive beamforming, while cybertwin technology directs resource cooperation among multicells and allocates computing and communication resources. Our main objective is to optimize the system’s utility with respect to task completion latency and energy consumption reduction. To achieve this goal, we conduct the joint optimization of task offloading and resource allocation. Furthermore, we develop a joint task offloading and resource allocation (JTORA) algorithm to derive optimal solutions for passive beamforming design, computing offloading decisions, communication resource scheduling, and computing capacity allocation. The simulation results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm over benchmark schemes in terms of edge computing efficiency. Furthermore, the system utility can be further enhanced by increasing the number of embedded RIS elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207