Bibliographic record
Abstract
: Chapter 2 introduces Fritz Lang's Dr. Mabuse der Spieler (1922) as the quintessential film that embodies all of the key crises of finance capital and modernity. It examines how the film connects crises of authority, identity, authenticity, and rationality back to the realm of finance capital. Dr. Mabuse both threatens fixed notions of territory, colonies, border, and nation while also embodying a fantasy of empowerment and mobility for the emergent class of Angestellten (‘white-collar workers’) as a film-going public. The film is situated in the context of the figures of the Raffke and Schieber , two established stereotypes of the profiteers and nouveau riche of the time, and as part of a micro-genre of Börsenfilme (‘stock-exchange films’) of the time of the hyperinflation. Keywords: Dr. Mabuse, Fritz Lang, Fictions of Finance, Hyperinflation, German Colonies, Salaried Masses Dr. Mabuse the Speculator Introduction Fritz Lang's two-part Dr. Mabuse der Spieler: Ein Bild der Zeit was released in April and May 1922, during a period in which the Berlin stock exchange was closed for all but one day per week due to the overwhelming demand of speculators. The ‘flight from the mark’ that characterized the hyperinflation at this time blurred the boundary between speculation and investment, and made speculation in currencies a common practice. This chapter situates Lang's canonical two-part film, the full title of which is Dr. Mabuse der Spieler: Der Große Spieler: Ein Bild der Zeit (released on April 27, 1922) and Inferno: Ein Spiel von Menschen Unserer Zeit (released on May 26, 1922), within this historical context. Here, I take my cue from Siegfried Kracauer in discussing the film-going audience of the period, who were members of the class of Angestellten , the numbers of which increased exponentially after the war. In so doing, I attempt to identify and draw attention to the overlooked cultural and historical signifiers that would have resonated with this class of workers, a workforce that, in Berlin, included members of the rapidly expanding financial sector. I also reconsider the ways in which this key film reflects and amplifies a worldview that resonated with the daily professional engagement of these workers with the money economy and financial markets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".