MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392219359 · doi:10.1017/9789048551934.003

Dr. Mabuse and His Doubles

2023· other· en· W4392219359 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: Chapter 2 introduces Fritz Lang's Dr. Mabuse der Spieler (1922) as the quintessential film that embodies all of the key crises of finance capital and modernity. It examines how the film connects crises of authority, identity, authenticity, and rationality back to the realm of finance capital. Dr. Mabuse both threatens fixed notions of territory, colonies, border, and nation while also embodying a fantasy of empowerment and mobility for the emergent class of Angestellten (‘white-collar workers’) as a film-going public. The film is situated in the context of the figures of the Raffke and Schieber , two established stereotypes of the profiteers and nouveau riche of the time, and as part of a micro-genre of Börsenfilme (‘stock-exchange films’) of the time of the hyperinflation. Keywords: Dr. Mabuse, Fritz Lang, Fictions of Finance, Hyperinflation, German Colonies, Salaried Masses Dr. Mabuse the Speculator Introduction Fritz Lang's two-part Dr. Mabuse der Spieler: Ein Bild der Zeit was released in April and May 1922, during a period in which the Berlin stock exchange was closed for all but one day per week due to the overwhelming demand of speculators. The ‘flight from the mark’ that characterized the hyperinflation at this time blurred the boundary between speculation and investment, and made speculation in currencies a common practice. This chapter situates Lang's canonical two-part film, the full title of which is Dr. Mabuse der Spieler: Der Große Spieler: Ein Bild der Zeit (released on April 27, 1922) and Inferno: Ein Spiel von Menschen Unserer Zeit (released on May 26, 1922), within this historical context. Here, I take my cue from Siegfried Kracauer in discussing the film-going audience of the period, who were members of the class of Angestellten , the numbers of which increased exponentially after the war. In so doing, I attempt to identify and draw attention to the overlooked cultural and historical signifiers that would have resonated with this class of workers, a workforce that, in Berlin, included members of the rapidly expanding financial sector. I also reconsider the ways in which this key film reflects and amplifies a worldview that resonated with the daily professional engagement of these workers with the money economy and financial markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2460.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical History and ResearchFrench-language works237,207