Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we connect the idea of single-valued neutrosophic ideal to the concept of single-valued neutrosophic approximation space to define the concept of single-valued neutrosophic ideal approximation spaces. We present the single-valued neutrosophic ideal approximation interior operator intψΦ and the single-valued neutrosophic ideal approximation closure operator clψΦ, and we present the single-valued neutrosophic ideal approximation preinterior operator pintψΦ and the single-valued neutrosophic ideal approximation pre-closure operator pclψΦ about this concerning single-valued neutrosophic ideal defined on the single-valued neutrosophic approximation space (χ˜,ϕ) related with some single-valued neutrosophic set ψ∈ξχ˜. Also, we present single-valued neutrosophic separation axioms, single-valued neutrosophic connectedness, and single-valued neutrosophic compactness in single-valued neutrosophic approximation spaces and single-valued neutrosophic ideal approximation spaces as well, and prove the associations in between.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".