MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392223426 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.123028

Fireball antinucleosynthesis

2024· preprint· en· W4392223426 on OpenAlex
Michael A. Fedderke, David E. Kaplan, Anubhav Mathur, Surjeet Rajendran, Erwin H. Tanin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicChemical Reactions and Isotopes
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersOffice of ScienceMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueAspen Center for PhysicsU.S. Department of EnergyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationSimons FoundationStony Brook UniversityGovernment of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNucleosynthesisPhysicsNuclear physicsAstrophysicsNuclear reaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tentative identification of approximately ten relativistic antihelium (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>He</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="true">¯</a:mo></a:mover></a:math>) cosmic-ray events at AMS-02 would, if confirmed, challenge our understanding of the astrophysical synthesis of heavy antinuclei. We propose a novel scenario for the enhanced production of such antinuclei that is triggered by isolated, catastrophic injections of large quantities of energetic Standard Model (SM) antiquarks in our galaxy by physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). We demonstrate that SM antinucleosynthetic processes that occur in the resulting rapidly expanding, thermalized fireballs of SM plasma can, for a reasonable range of parameters, produce the reported tentative <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mo>∼</e:mo><e:mn>2</e:mn><e:mo>:</e:mo><e:mn>1</e:mn></e:math> ratio of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mrow><g:mmultiscripts><g:mrow><g:mover accent="true"><g:mrow><g:mi>He</g:mi></g:mrow><g:mrow><g:mo stretchy="true">¯</g:mo></g:mrow></g:mover></g:mrow><g:mprescripts/><g:none/><g:mn>3</g:mn></g:mmultiscripts></g:mrow></g:math> to <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mrow><k:mmultiscripts><k:mrow><k:mover accent="true"><k:mrow><k:mi>He</k:mi></k:mrow><k:mrow><k:mo stretchy="true">¯</k:mo></k:mrow></k:mover></k:mrow><k:mprescripts/><k:none/><k:mn>4</k:mn></k:mmultiscripts></k:mrow></k:math> events at AMS-02, as well as their relativistic boosts. Moreover, we show that this can be achieved without violating antideuterium or antiproton flux constraints for the appropriate antihelium fluxes. A plausible BSM paradigm for the catastrophic injections is the collision of macroscopic composite dark-matter objects carrying large net antibaryon number. Such a scenario would require these objects to be cosmologically stable, but to destabilize upon collision, promptly releasing a fraction of their mass energy into SM antiparticles within a tiny volume. We show that, in principle, the injection rate needed to attain the necessary antihelium fluxes and the energetic conditions required to seed the fireballs appear possible to obtain in such a paradigm. We leave open the question of constructing a BSM particle physics model to realize this, but we suggest two concrete scenarios as promising targets for further investigation. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.469 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it