MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Inherited Crustal Features and Southern Alaska Tectonic History Constrained by Sp Receiver Functions

2024· preprint· en· W4392230579 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Everett Mann, K. M. Fischer, Jeffrey A. Benowitz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyTerraneSubductionSeismologyFault (geology)TectonicsInduced seismicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Southern Alaska is a collage of fault-bounded accreted terranes. The deformation history of these crustal blocks and geometric history of the bounding faults reflect both inherited features and subsequent convergent margin events. Multiple dense (<20-km spacing) arrays of broadband seismometers across southern Alaska has previously allowed for imaging of crustal structure across the region using various seismic imaging methods. Here, we employ S-toP receiver functions to investigate the crustal structure of southern Alaska for signals of dynamic tectonic activity. The subduction zone plate interface and subducting slab Moho are imaged dipping at shallow (<60-km) depths across the southernmost part of the subduction zone. Along two different transects, an inboard-dipping (~15°) boundary is imaged intersecting the trace of the Border Ranges Fault at the surface that we infer represents an unrotated inboard-dipping paleosubduction (Mesozoic) interface. This observation is combined with previous seismic imaging along both the Border Ranges Fault and the next seaward terrane-bounding fault-the Contact Fault-to buttress a known history of convergent tectonics that varies along the margin. Along with large (>10-km) crustal thickness offsets imaged across both the Denali Fault system and the Manuscript in press at upcoming AGU Monograph Tectonics and Seismicity of Alaska and Western Canada: Earthscope and Beyond 2 Eureka Creek Fault, this feature supports a Mesozoic-to-Present inboard-dipping (east and northward) subduction polarity in the region. Additionally, the Sp CCP volume reveals a 100-km x 50-km sized positive velocity gradient with depth (PVG) at ~25-km depth beneath the Copper River Basin, which we interpret as the top of a region of active underplating and/or intrusion of basaltic magmatism into the lower crust. This feature may be related to the generation of a new Wrangell Volcanic Field volcano, resulting from the underlying tear in the subducting slab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207