MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392236834 · doi:10.1080/15213269.2024.2319588

A Longitudinal Test of Political Self-Effects on Social Media

2024· article· en· W4392236834 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel S. Lane, Cassandra M. Moxley, Gwen Petro, Arvin Jagayat

Bibliographic record

VenueMedia Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTest (biology)PoliticsPsychologySocial psychologySocial mediaPoison controlSuicide preventionHuman factors and ergonomicsComputer securityPolitical scienceMedical emergencyComputer scienceMedicineGeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This registered report details a longitudinal experiment testing political self-effects – changes in issue-related attitudes and indicators of political self-concept – resulting from political expression on social media. We also tested whether such effects were due to the composition or release of political messages on social media over time. American adults (N = 576), logged on to a fictional social media platform and engaged with discussions involving one of two political issues at three time points over a week. We examined whether participants who wrote a comment about the issue publicly (on the social media platform) or privately (in a text box) experienced changes in their issue-related attitudes or political self-concepts (compared to a control condition). Overall, we did not find consistent main effects of message composition or release at individual timepoints. Instead, message composition sustained issue-related attitudes over time (vs. control). Interaction analyses found that among those with high baseline issue interest, expression (vs. control) led to decreased issue interest and importance over time. Among those high in baseline political interest, message release (vs. control) increased positive issue-related attitudes. We outline an agenda for studying political self-effects that addresses, a) their cumulative nature, b) conditional effects, and c) the challenge of endogeneity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedia PsychologySame topicSocial Media and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207