MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392236910 · doi:10.2118/217935-ms

Application of Hydraulic Port Collars in Two Stage Cementing Operations Reduces Rig Time/Drilling Cost in the Permian Basin

2024· article· en· W4392236910 on OpenAlexaff
David Giffin, Y. P. Ortez, Tom O’Grady, Arthur Loginov, Greg Venus

Bibliographic record

VenueIADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingDrillDrill stringCollarDrillingDrill pipeEngineeringPort (circuit theory)Drilling engineeringPetroleum engineeringMechanical engineeringMarine engineeringAnnulus (botany)Drill bitHydraulic motorMeasurement while drillingMining engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Operators in the Permian Basin have been performing two stage cementing operations on their casing strings for decades utilizing conventional diverter tool technology, often in combination with casing annulus packers. Over time, issues with legacy diverter tools (DV) have been identified and solutions sought. These issues range from longer than desired time to drill-out the DV tool, reluctance to drill-out a DV tool with a directional assembly due to drill bit dulling and premature drilling motor/MWD failures, damage to the DV tool while drilling causing leaks and remediation, and an inability to pressure test the whole casing string after cementing. A development effort was made to eliminate these issues. The Hydraulic Port Collar (HPC) was designed and extensive qualification/testing of the HPC design was performed prior to field deployment. Running procedures were written and revised in consultation with a variety of operators. Several wells were identified for field trials. The wells were selected based on the operator’s desire to eliminate a DV tool drill-out. The wells had complex directional plans that required high bend drilling motors resulting in the operator’s reluctance to drill-out conventional DV tools with the curve BHA’s. The hydraulic port collar functioned as designed on all field trials. Pressure readings from the cement trucks confirmed the tools opened within the calculated pressures and closed and sheared out within the calculated pressures. Full communication of compressed volume, from the float collar to surface was achieved, allowing the operator to perform a full string casing test. The wiper plug was mechanically confirmed as released from the HPC and subsequently pushed to bottom and drilled up when the shoe track was drilled out. Utilizing curve BHA’s with 2.12° to 2.38° bend motors, all wells were drilled and landed in the drilling window with one curve BHA run. As a result, dedicated DV tool drill-out runs were eliminated, no unusual damage or dulling of the curve BHA was observed and no post drill-out damage/leaks at the HPC were experienced. A review of the field trials showed efficiency gains up to 40% when compared to previous operations where legacy DV tools had been deployed. These trials confirm that the novel Hydraulic Port Collar can increase operator efficiency in wells that require two stage cementing operations. This paper will document case histories and lessons learn to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and ExhibitionSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207