Conversion of Phytochemicals by Lactobacilli: (Phospho)-β-glucosidases Are Specific for Glucosylated Phytochemicals Rather than Disaccharides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Food-fermenting lactobacilli convert glycosylated phytochemicals to glycosyl hydrolases and thereby alter their biological activity. This study aimed to investigate the microbial transformation of β-glucosides of phytochemicals in comparison with utilization of cellobiose. Four homofermentative and four heterofermentative lactobacilli were selected to represent the metabolic diversity of Lactobacillaceae . The genomes of Lactobacillus crispatus, Companilactobacillus paralimentarius, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum encoded for 8 to 22 enzymes, predominantly phospho-β-glucosidases, with predicted activity on β-glucosides. Levilactobacillus hammesii and Furfurilactobacillus milii encoded for 3 β-glucosidases, Furfurilactobacillus rossiae for one, and Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis for none. The hydrolysis of amygdalin, esculin, salicin, glucosides of quercetin and genistein, and ginsenosides demonstrated that several strains hydrolyzed β-glucosides of phytochemicals but not cellobiose. Taken together, several of the carbohydrate-active enzymes of food-fermenting lactobacilli are specific for glycosides of phytochemicals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".