MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392240973 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.190229

The Nexus Between ICT, Trade Openness, Urbanization, Natural Resources, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth

2024· article· en· W4392240973 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Sutbayeva, Daulen Abdeshov, Shynar Shodyrayeva, Altynay Maukenova, Xhelil Bekteshi, Mesut Doğan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Productivity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNexus (standard)Openness to experienceUrbanizationForeign direct investmentInformation and Communications TechnologyNatural resourceInvestment (military)BusinessInternational tradeNatural resource economicsEconomicsInternational economicsEconomic growthPolitical scienceEngineeringMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to identify the determinants of economic growth (Y) in Kazakhstan over the period 1990-2022.In other words, the effects of urbanization (URB), natural resources (NR), trade openness (TO), foreign direct investment (FDI), and ICT variables on Y were to be determined.In the study, ARDL method and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) were employed to determine the short and long-term effects.As a result of the analysis, it was found that URB, TO, FDI, and ICT increased Y in the short and long run.On the other hand, NR did not affect Y.The results of the VECM revealed a bilateral causality between URB, TO, FDI, ICT, and Y in the short and long run.Finally, no causality was found between NR and Y.These findings may help policymakers in realizing Kazakhstan's economic development goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEconomic Growth and ProductivityFrench-language works237,207