Sustainable Development of Islamic Banks by Creating Islamic Branding: Challenges, Importance, and Strategies of Islamic Branding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article delves into sustainable growth strategies for Islamic banks, focusing on expanding and developing Islamic branding.Overcoming challenges and outlining an essential strategy, the research, conducted using the PRISMA model, reviews articles from various academic databases.The findings emphasize Sharia compliance as a critical strategy for sustainable development, ensuring strict adherence to Islamic principles in all financial products and services.This approach builds trust within the Muslim community, distinguishing Islamic banks from conventional institutions and establishing a foundation rooted in commitment to Islamic values.The research underscores the ethical principles of Islamic banking, emphasizing risk-sharing and social justice, and highlights the significance of Islamic branding in reinforcing moral foundations and attracting ethically conscious customers.The study highlights how effective branding enhances trust, facilitating financial inclusion and social responsibility.It implies a need for regulatory frameworks supporting standardized Islamic branding, consumer education, and incentives for ethical practices, positioning Islamic banking as a valuable contributor to the financial landscape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".