PulmoNet: a novel deep learning based pulmonary diseases detection model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulmonary diseases are various pathological conditions that affect respiratory tissues and organs, making the exchange of gas challenging for animals inhaling and exhaling. It varies from gentle and self-limiting such as the common cold and catarrh, to life-threatening ones, such as viral pneumonia (VP), bacterial pneumonia (BP), and tuberculosis, as well as a severe acute respiratory syndrome, such as the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). The cost of diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary infections is on the high side, most especially in developing countries, and since radiography images (X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scan images) have proven beneficial in detecting various pulmonary infections, many machine learning (ML) models and image processing procedures have been utilized to identify these infections. The need for timely and accurate detection can be lifesaving, especially during a pandemic. This paper, therefore, suggested a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) founded image detection model, optimized with image augmentation technique, to detect three (3) different pulmonary diseases (COVID-19, bacterial pneumonia, and viral pneumonia). The dataset containing four (4) different classes (healthy (10,325), COVID-19 (3,749), BP (883), and VP (1,478)) was utilized as training/testing data for the suggested model. The model's performance indicates high potential in detecting the three (3) classes of pulmonary diseases. The model recorded average detection accuracy of 94%, 95.4%, 99.4%, and 98.30%, and training/detection time of about 60/50 s. This result indicates the proficiency of the suggested approach when likened to the traditional texture descriptors technique of pulmonary disease recognition utilizing X-ray and CT scan images. This study introduces an innovative deep convolutional neural network model to enhance the detection of pulmonary diseases like COVID-19 and pneumonia using radiography. This model, notable for its accuracy and efficiency, promises significant advancements in medical diagnostics, particularly beneficial in developing countries due to its potential to surpass traditional diagnostic methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".