Wind Resource for Tindouf Location in Southern Algeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the wind potential of Tindouf located in southern Algeria has been estimated; to determine wind characteristics (distributions and wind rose) and evaluate the wind energy density, the Weibull distribution model is a widely used method for calculating wind frequency distribution.The study used the maximum likelihood method to estimate the wind speed and direction.The wind speed class was found to be the most prevalent in autumn and winter, with the highest percentage in spring and summer.The wind power density of Tindouf was found to be 224.37W/m 2 , with the dominant sector being the west, accounting for 29.4% of wind time.The wind speed classes were most prevalent in the eastern sector, accounting for 20.4% of wind time.The wind power density varied from 121.60 W/m 2 in August to 335.85 W/m 2 in April, with the average seasonal density varying from 161.38 W/m 2 in autumn to 280.87 W/m 2 in spring.Tindouf location is classified as part of the PNL 4th classes, making it an ideal location for wind farms.Wind turbine rows must be oriented perpendicular to the west, generating energy continuously from January until peaking in May.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".