MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392242281 · doi:10.1080/21680566.2024.2315509

Second-based queue length estimation with fusing MMW and low penetration rate CAV trajectory data

2024· article· en· W4392242281 on OpenAlexaff
Shuxian He, Yuhao Du, Jiangchen Li, Liqun Peng, Tony Z. Qiu, Yi Zhang, Jianhua Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportmetrica B Transport Dynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsQueueTrajectoryPenetration (warfare)Computer scienceMathematicsPhysicsComputer networkOperations research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper combines millimeter-wave radar (MMW) data with connected autonomous vehicle (CAV) trajectory data to estimate queue length on a second-by-second basis. Firstly, queued vehicles on multiple lanes with the same traffic movement are mapped to a virtual lane. Then, the presence of CAV or human-driven vehicle (HDV) for any given queueing index is determined. A Bayesian joint probability model is subsequently established for queue length expectation, considering the existence of the queued vehicle type as a condition. The average time headway and dissipation speed distribution are derived from departure timestamps, which allows for the calculation of the prior probability ratio of queue length. Lastly, the maximum likelihood estimation (EM) algorithm is employed for iteratively estimating the CAV penetration rate. Simulation results demonstrate the method offers a compelling trade-off between precision and second-based real-time performance, while field test results further confirm the wide applicability under various traffic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportmetrica B Transport DynamicsSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207