Le site patrimonial et l’expérience du visiteur local. L’évaluation de l’expérience de la visite de la Médina de Tunis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les sites patrimoniaux offrent une expérience de visite culturelle, authentique et émotionnelle. La présente étude tente de mieux comprendre les dimensions de l’expérience et les réponses affectives vécues par les visiteurs locaux de la Médina de Tunis. Sur le plan théorique, cette recherche s’est appuyée sur l’approche marketing expérientiel et le courant de la CCT « Consumer Culture Theory ». Sur le plan empirique, des entretiens semi-directifs ont été conduits auprès de 42 visiteurs. L’analyse a permis d’identifier trois univers de la visite: (1) l’univers identitaire et culturel, (2) l’univers spatio-temporel et (3) l’univers émotionnel. Le visiteur local vit différentes expériences – esthétique, éducationnelle, et paroxystique –, s’approprie le lieu authentique et s’y rapproche au niveau identitaire. En outre, l’expérience de visite apparait comme un « objet temporel » et génère de la nostalgie ainsi qu’un ensemble d’émotions positives d’apaisement, de joie, de bien-être et de libération.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".