IDENTIFICATION, ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF OVINE BRONCHIOLOALVEOLAR PROGENITORS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bronchioloalveolar stem cells located at the bronchiolar/alveolar junction may be involved inembryogenesis or regeneration. These cells have not yet been described in large animals, and they mayenable the development of new therapeutics to treat acute or chronic lung disease. In this study, weaimed to establish the presence of bronchioloalveolar stem cells in ovine lungs and to characterize theirstemness properties. Lung cells were studied using immunohistochemistry on frozen sections of the lung,and immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry were conducted on derived cells. The stem cells wereidentified by co-expression of CCSP, SP-C and the CD34 hematopoietic stem-cell marker. A minorpopulation of CD34pos/SP-Cpos/CCSPpos cells (0.33% ± 0.31) was present ex vivo in cell suspensions fromdissociated lungs. Using CD34 magnetic positive cell sorting, undifferentiated SP-Cpos/CCSPpos cellswere purified (>80%) and maintained in culture. Using synthetic media and various extracellular matrixes,SP-Cpos/CCSPpos cells differentiated into either Clara cells or alveolar epithelial type-II cells. Furthermore,bronchioloalveolar stem cells obtained ex vivo and in vitro expressed the stem cell-specific genesNANOG, OCT4 and BMI1. We report for the first time in a large animal the existence ofbronchioloalveolar stem cells with dual differentiation potential and the expression of stem cell-specificgenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".