Stimulation mapping and whole-brain modeling reveal gradients of excitability and recurrence in cortical networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The human brain exhibits a modular and hierarchical structure, spanning low-order sensorimotor to high-order cognitive/affective systems. What is the causal significance of this organization for brain dynamics and information processing properties? We investigated this question using rare simultaneous multimodal electrophysiology (stereotactic and scalp EEG) recordings in patients during presurgical intracerebral electrical stimulation (iES). Our analyses revealed an anatomical gradient of excitability across the cortex, with stronger iES-evoked EEG responses in high-order compared to low-order regions. Mathematical modeling further showed that this variation in excitability levels results from a differential dependence of recurrent feedback from non-stimulated regions across the anatomical hierarchy, and could be extinguished by suppressing those connections in-silico. High-order brain regions/networks thus show a more functionally integrated processing style than low-order ones, which manifests as a spatial gradient of excitability that is emergent from, and causally dependent on, the underlying hierarchical network structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".