MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392244098 · doi:10.1002/acr2.11657

Improvements in <scp>Patient‐Reported</scp> Outcomes Through Six Months of Guselkumab Treatment in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: <scp>Real‐World</scp> Data From the <scp>CorEvitas</scp> Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry

2024· article· en· W4392244098 on OpenAlexaff
Philip J. Mease, Alexis Ogdie, John Tesser, Natalie J. Shiff, Ruizhi Zhao, Soumya D. Chakravarty, Michael Kelleman, Rhiannon Dodge, Robert R. McLean, Aaron Broadwell, Arthur Kavanaugh, Joseph F. Merola

Bibliographic record

VenueACR Open Rheumatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersJanssen Scientific AffairsCelgeneBristol-Myers SquibbAmgen
KeywordsMedicinePsoriatic arthritisVisual analogue scaleInternal medicineArthritisDermatology Life Quality IndexPsoriasisPhysical therapyDermatologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Evaluate patient‐reported outcomes after 6 months of on‐label guselkumab use in patients with rheumatologist‐diagnosed active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the CorEvitas PsA/Spondyloarthritis Registry. Methods This analysis includes registry participants who initiated and persisted with on‐label guselkumab (after US Food and Drug Administration approval for PsA; 100 mg at weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks) at their 6‐month follow‐up visit (On‐Label Persisters). Among patients not meeting response criteria at baseline, responses at 6 months were determined for patient‐reported outcomes, including patient‐reported pain (0–100 mm visual analog scale), patient global assessment of arthritis + psoriasis (PtGA; 0–100 visual analog scale), and Health Assessment Questionnaire‐Disability Index (HAQ‐DI; 0‐3). Unadjusted, nominal P values were calculated via single‐proportion, one‐sided test (H 0 = 0%; α = 0.05). Results Of 90 On‐Label Persisters, most had treatment‐resistant PsA (92.2% and 73.3% previously received ≥1 and ≥2 biologic/targeted synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs, respectively), with mean (SD) baseline patient‐reported pain, PtGA, and HAQ‐DI scores of 57.0 (24.6), 50.3 (24.4), and 0.9 (0.6), respectively. Among those with patient‐reported pain and PtGA scores of at least 15 at baseline, 40.2% (33/82) and 46.8% (36/77), respectively, achieved at least 15‐mm reductions at 6 months; among those with HAQ‐DI scores of at least 0.35 and more than 0.5 at baseline, respectively, 30.4% (21/69) achieved improvements of at least 0.35 and 10.3% (6/58) achieved scores of 0.5 or lower at 6 months (all nominal P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Pain and physical function are important contributors to health‐related quality of life. In this real‐world population of patients with treatment‐resistant PsA and 6 months of persistent guselkumab treatment, clinically meaningful improvements in pain and physical function were achieved by approximately 40% and 30% of patients, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACR Open RheumatologySame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207