MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392255799 · doi:10.22374/cjmrp.v21i1.5

Leveraging Quality Improvement and Change-Management Tools to Change the Scope of Practice

2023· article· en· W4392255799 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aderemi Ejiwunmi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsTrillium Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Quality managementChange management (ITSM)Quality (philosophy)Process managementBusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceOperations managementEngineeringManagement systemMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In October of 2019 the College of Midwives of Ontario amended the Standard on Prescribing andAdministering Drugs to remove the limitation that restricted midwives from administering oxytocin in the intrapartum period on their own authority. Trillium Health Partners uses ADKAR, a standardized change management tool for large scale change. As part of the implementation plan related to this change in scope of practice, the Midwifery Division at Trillium Health Partners, used ADKAR and a quality improvement framework to review outcomes pre and post implementation, to ensure the quality of care midwifery clients received remained consistent through the change of practice. Outcome, process and balancing measuresremained consistent in the post implementation phase and the results were reported out to the whole Women’s Health team. This article is a reflection on the value of using a quality improvement framework as part of the change management process, as a helpful tool in the expansion of scope of practice. RÉSUMÉEn octobre 2019, l’Ordre des sages-femmes de l’Ontario a modifié la norme sur la prescription etl’administration de médicaments pour enlever la limite qui empêchait les sages-femmes d’administrer de l’ocytocine de leur propre chef durant la période intrapartum. Trillium Health Partners recourt à ADKAR, un outil de changement normalisé pour les modifications de grande envergure. Dans le cadre du plan de mise en oeuvre de ce changement du champ d’activité, la Division de la pratique sage-femme de Trillium Health Partners a utilisé ADKAR et un cadre d’amélioration de la qualité afin d’examiner les issues avant et après l’instauration de la nouvelle approche pour assurer le maintien de la qualité des soins offerts à la clientèleà la suite de la modification de la pratique. Les données fournies par les indicateurs relatifs aux issues et au processus et par les indicateurs de pondération sont demeurées constantes après la mise en oeuvre. Les résultats ont été communiqués à toute l’équipe des services de santé des femmes. Le présent article témoigne de l’utilité de l’emploi d’un cadre d’amélioration de la qualité dans le contexte du processus de gestion du changement comme outil d’élargissement du champ de pratique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.180
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.152
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1800.152
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0100.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0170.013
Open science0.0040.013
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.482
GPT teacher head0.593
Teacher spread0.112 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Midwifery Research and PracticeSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207