MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392260194 · doi:10.31948/esrii.v2i1.1711

Propuesta de implementación de NIIF en una empresa del sector de la Construcción

2019· article· es· W4392260194 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Johana Marisol Tobar Meza, Mabel Cecilia Loaiza López, Giovana Alexandra Melo Carrillo, Daniela Andrea Rosales Díaz

Bibliographic record

VenueExcelsium Scientia Revista Internacional de Investigación · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArctic Goose Joint Venture
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente artículo es resultado de la investigación “Informe Final de Implementación de Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera (NIIF) en la empresa constructora Davinci S.A.S. de la ciudad de Pasto, enero de 2015”, de la Facultad de Posgrados y Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad Mariana. El sector de la construcción ha tenido un auge importante en los últimos años, por lo cual es necesario que las empresas vinculadas a este sector, implementen las Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera (NIIF). Para contribuir con este proceso, el presente artículo propone la implementación de las NIIF en una empresa constructora de la ciudad de Pasto. Para ello se utilizó una metodología cualitativa a través de una entrevista semi-estructurada y un análisis cuantitativo de los estados financieros de la empresa a través de métodos contables. Entre los principales resultados se encontró que el manejo contable de la empresa se ajusta al método PCGA. Además, se logró establecer las políticas de medición, reconocimiento y revelación a deudores, propiedad planta y equipo, inversiones, cuentas por pagar y obligaciones financieras, ingresos y gastos. Finalmente se presentan las estrategias para el cumplimiento de las actividades para la implementación de las NIIF para Pymes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExcelsium Scientia Revista Internacional de InvestigaciónSame topicOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesFrench-language works237,207